Thanks for the quick response. I'd say it's ready to go with the
additional changes.

Kind regards,
Maarten Derickx

On Sep 13, 11:25 am, Minh Nguyen <nguyenmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi koffie,
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:45 PM, koffie <m.derickx.stud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I definitely like the new compatible lay-out.
>
> > When I looked 
> > athttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/9850/walkthrough...
> > my eye spotted some details which leave room for some more
> > improvement.
>
> > 1. The grey background of the search button (with the tekst "GO" on
> > it) should be a darker shade of the "blue/purple" used all over sage
> > docs.
>
> I have changed that to a pale, light grayish blue to be consistent
> with the colour of the header and footer. The hex code is #B8B9F6.
>
> > 2. I really like the change of the ugly pale green to pale yellow for
> > the background of the code blocks. The lines above and below these
> > boxes however should also change their color, from green to a darker
> > shade of yellow.
>
> Done. I have changed the border colour from green to a pale, light
> grayish amber. The corresponding hex code is #E8D898.
>
> > 3. Locations like "SAGE_ROOT/blah/blahblah" and "/home/bla/di/
> > blahblah" have a light grey background which is very similar but not
> > the same as the pale shade of purple/blue used all over in sage. This
> > should be exactly the same color, or a significant different color
> > still fitting the color scheme.
>
> Done. The colour used for shading commands or code within text is now
> consistent with the colour used for the background of the navigation
> bar. It is a light bluish gray with hex code #EAEAF8.
>
> > 4. The grey lines, (one is right of the navigation bar and the others
> > are below the section headers) sort of only half fit the color scheme.
> > I don't think it's very ugly right now, but maybe the darker shade of
> > purple used in the background on the top of the page, or the color of
> > the purple line around the search box would fit better.
>
> This is something I'm unable to fix.
>
> > I think the style issues 1 and 2 really should get adressed. I find 3
> > and 4 less important because they are less eye catching.
>
> See ticket #9850 [1] for a patch that addresses your comments above.
> The generated documentation can be found at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/patch/9850-docstyle/doc/
>
> [1]http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9850
>
> --
> Regards
> Minh Van Nguyen

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to