On 12 September 2010 10:29, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sep 12, 5:14 pm, David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: >> On 12 September 2010 10:03, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Dave, >> > this is meant to be MacOSX-specific, for testing of the concept. >> > If this flies on 10.x for x!=5, with hardware not necessarily PPC, >> > then we are in business >> > and can go this way. >> >> > Dima >> >> But the point is the SAGE_FORTRAN variable is supposed to be able to >> point to an arbitrary Fortran compiler - irrespective of the operating >> system. It's quite feasible someone will want to use a Fortran that is >> not the first gfortran in their path - that's the whole point of using >> environment variables. > > I fully appreciate environmental variables, but > I am just talking about *feasibility* of getting rid of g95 supplied > with Sage in fortran spkg, nothing beyond this > point. > If this is feasible, then the whole thing with using whatever Fortran > one pleases would look much cleaner, IMHO. > > Dima
Fair enough. Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
