On 14 July 2010 00:49, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sage Developers,
>
> I'm setting the Sage-5.0 target date for August 31, 2010 (see
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/milestone/sage-5.0).  The goals
> are:
>
>  1. Windows port via Cygwin: 
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/CygwinPort
>  2. Upgrade PARI to svn: #9343
>  3. Upgrade MPIR to version 2.x: #8664
>  4. Raise the coverage score to 90%
>  5. (Done) Sparc Solaris 10

Currently the SPARC is only 32-bit. If you are lucky, you might get
64-bit SPARC and/or OpenSolaris x64 by then. I rekon there is an 80%
chance of one or the other by then. Just as I write, I'm trying a
64-bit build on 't2' in

/rootpool2/local/kirkby/64/sage-4.5.rc0

73 packages have all built as 64-bit binaries and the build is still
going. I think the build will fail (singular, pynac, libfpll are
likely problems), but I suspect by the end of August a 64-bit build is
possible. I've solved all those on x64, though some of the solutions
are rather hackish.

With the exception of R and Maxima, Sage actually builds on
OpenSolaris x64, but it crashes at startup and I don't have much idea
how to debug that. (I created you an account on my quad core 3.33 GHz
Xeon if you want to try debugging it).

disk.math needs quite a bit of setting up, as too many tools are too
old, or configured in a way that wont work. It would take the best
part of a day to sort out disk.math for building Sage.

There's a good chance Maxima and R might build on 64-bit SPARC, and
the patches to pynac, singular and libfplll that work on OpenSolaris
x64, should work on 64-bit SPARC.

So you can probably be a bit more optimistic on the Solaris front, and
not just consider it done.

Dave

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to