On Jun 21, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 06/20/10 11:19 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
Anyway, what of the following would be considered worth doing first,
given I don't have the time or inclination to do them all? All these
lack an spk-check file.
Python has been resolved.
John Palmieri has reviewed the python package
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/revised-patches/python-2.6.4.p9.spkg
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9295
so we can now check python.
So far, all systems tested (OS X, Solaris and OpenSolaris) all have
5 failures, though the 5 failures are not the same, though
'test_distutils' has failed on all platforms tested to date.
So what of these is most critical in Sage, and could most do with
being tested?
It seem strange we are only checking about 20% of the packages, even
if SAGE_CHECK is yes.
Yes, I guess you could say we trust the upstream testing too much.
I'll add an spkg-check to Cython the next time I update that package.
- Robert
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
