On 06/10/10 10:43 AM, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 07:16:56AM +0100, David Kirkby wrote:
drkir...@redstart:~$ cat /usr/lib/pkgconfig/freetype2.pc
prefix=/usr/sfw
exec_prefix=${prefix}
libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib
includedir=${prefix}/include
Name: FreeType 2
Description: A free, high-quality, and portable font engine.
Version: 9.7.3
Requires:
Libs: -L${libdir} -R${libdir} -lfreetype
Cflags: -I${includedir}/freetype2
Perhaps that file has an error in it, or perhaps freetype2 at one
point decided to change their version numbering in a rather odd way,
going backwards!
Freetype just has a couple of different versioning schemes. The version number
"9.7.3" in the .pc file corresponds to release 2.1.9, and "9.16.3" corresponds
to release 2.3.5. (And then there's the numbering scheme which it uses for its
.so versions, which is different yet again.)
See the file src/docs/VERSION.DLL in the freetype package for details.
-Willem Jan
Thank you. Having read src/docs/VERSION.DLL, I see that there are in fact
*three* different numbers all associated with the version. It is any wonder I've
been confused?
Dave
release libtool so
-------------------------------
2.3.12 10.0.4 6.4.0
2.3.11 9.22.3 6.3.22
2.3.10 9.21.3 6.3.21
2.3.9 9.20.3 6.3.20
2.3.8 9.19.3 6.3.19
2.3.7 9.18.3 6.3.18
2.3.6 9.17.3 6.3.17
2.3.5 9.16.3 6.3.16
2.3.4 9.15.3 6.3.15
2.3.3 9.14.3 6.3.14
2.3.2 9.13.3 6.3.13
2.3.1 9.12.3 6.3.12
2.3.0 9.11.3 6.3.11
2.2.1 9.10.3 6.3.10
2.2.0 9.9.3 6.3.9
2.1.10 9.8.3 6.3.8
2.1.9 9.7.3 6.3.7
2.1.8 9.6.3 6.3.6
2.1.7 9.5.3 6.3.5
2.1.6 9.5.3 6.3.5
2.1.5 9.4.3 6.3.4
2.1.4 9.3.3 6.3.3
2.1.3 9.2.3 6.3.2
2.1.2 9.1.3 6.3.1
2.1.1 9.0.3 ?
2.1.0 8.0.2 ?
2.0.9 9.0.3 ?
2.0.8 8.0.2 ?
2.0.4 7.0.1 ?
2.0.1 6.1.0 ?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
