On 3 Jun., 18:58, Florent Hivert <florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr> wrote: > > On 3 Jun., 15:20, Florent Hivert <florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 05:34:06PM -0700, leif wrote: > > > > Any measures of the slow down to Sphinx? > > > Does not really address my question. Think of a single file, what's > > the price/latency of importing sage.all to resolve not fully qualified > > targets (perhaps just a single one)? > > If you look at my new patch on trac I don't import sage.all though I search > into it.
;-) Ok, your patch at #9128 obsoleted my question... http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9128 (I was just fearing importing sage.all takes a lot of time, at least on older systems.) -Leif > Here are the result for a single file: > > Without: > sage -docbuild reference html 11,63s user 0,94s system 98% cpu 12,799 total > sage -docbuild reference html 11,70s user 0,90s system 98% cpu 12,776 total > sage -docbuild reference html 11,82s user 0,84s system 98% cpu 12,834 total > > With: > sage -docbuild reference html 11,67s user 0,96s system 98% cpu 12,815 total > sage -docbuild reference html 11,59s user 0,96s system 98% cpu 12,679 total > sage -docbuild reference html 11,78s user 0,87s system 98% cpu 12,793 total > > I see nothing very significative... Note that the things worked since I got > the message: > > Searching sage.combinat.partition.Partitions from sage.combinat.integer_list > WARNING: undefined symbol :mod:`sage.combinat.partition.Partitions` in module > sage.combinat.integer_list > > Cheers, > > Florent -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
