On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 05:34:06PM -0700, leif wrote: > On 3 Jun., 00:06, Florent Hivert <florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr> wrote: > > It seems that this is more or less easily feasible. I've a prototype patch > > to > > sphinx which only works for objects (eg: Parent). It won't work on thing > > like > > "Parent.rename". I'd like to know if it is a desired feature before > > polishing > > it further (and asking on sphinx-user for the good way to do this)... Also > > my > > solution involve hacking directly into sphinx. Any suggestion for a better > > way > > is welcome. > > > > So if anyone has a comment. Please answer. > > Any measures of the slow down to Sphinx?
I don't think it would be very measurable: Here is a comparison after issuing # touch *.py && sage -b && time sage -docbuild reference html without: sage -docbuild reference html 46,81s user 1,06s system 98% cpu 48,604 total sage -docbuild reference html 46,61s user 1,10s system 98% cpu 48,279 total with: sage -docbuild reference html 46,19s user 1,25s system 96% cpu 49,228 total sage -docbuild reference html 46,37s user 1,11s system 98% cpu 48,182 total > Could the use of macros be an alternative? Can you elaborate a little more ? Cheers, Florent -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
