On 05/14/10 03:01 PM, Harald Schilly wrote:
I found a table by NIST comparing sage with other software packages.
It's probably interesting for what they are looking for and I think
some entries are missing (feedback link at the bottom). Maybe worth
checking this out for the future of sage development or building our
own table like that?

table: http://dlmf.nist.gov/software/#T1

related earlier thread from nov 2008:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/eccccf67cffd4a84

H


Without reference to the version numbers of the software they comparing, such a table is a next to useless.

One can't say "Sage can do X" but you don't list it, since there is no idea what version of Sage they looked at. Likewise for the other packages. It's dated "2010-05-07" but clearly does not reflect what Sage could do on that date.

According to that table, Mathematica can't do the Lambert W-Function. As a non-mathematician, that does not mean a lot to me, but reading.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LambertW-Function.html

it says "The principal value of the Lambert W-function is implemented in Mathematica as ProductLog[z]. Different branches of the function are available in Mathematica as ProductLog[k, z], where k is any integer and k=0 corresponds to the principal value. Although undocumented, LambertW[k, z] autoevaluates to ProductLog[k, z] in Mathematica."

Nor, according to that table can Mathematica do interval arithmetic, yet there is a tutorial on Interval Arithmetic in the Mathematica documentation.

http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/IntervalArithmetic.html

IMHO, a school child could have done a better job. You don't need to be a mathematician to know that comparing software, without reference to the version numbers, is a bit silly.

Dave

--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to