On May 14, 2010, at 7:01 AM, Harald Schilly wrote:
I found a table by NIST comparing sage with other software packages. It's probably interesting for what they are looking for and I think some entries are missing (feedback link at the bottom).
E.g. we compute zeta(s) for s complex, but not for s real?
Maybe worth checking this out for the future of sage development or building our own table like that? table: http://dlmf.nist.gov/software/#T1
It would probably be worth making sure we fill out this table (e.g. wrapping Pari/SciPy/gsl/mpmath) to really see what's missing.
related earlier thread from nov 2008: http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/eccccf67cffd4a84 H -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
