It is correct that eclib only uses pari in a very small way (for factoring integers).
I am also willing to help upgrade to pari 2.4. Maybe Alex Ghitza would also join in -- he and I worked well together fixing a lot of pari precision issues in 2008. Perhaps this should be coordinated somehow (sage-pari?). It might be possible to split the work up a bit. John On 30 March 2010 17:13, Nick Alexander <ncalexan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> * Whoever tried last (Nick?), can they summarize some of the issues >> they encountered. > > I sent this a few days ago but it got confused, so I'm sending it again: > >> >> The thing that I remember was that large pieces of the C-interface have >> changed. Names changed, arguments changed, pieces removed... and the pari >> changelog was a little hit or miss on what changed. So I had to recompile, >> re-run, and find another symbol error to figure out what changed. I >> eventually used nm and got a little more systematic, but it was dozens >> (hundreds?) of small incompatibilities. > > > Nick > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sage-devel+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words > "REMOVE ME" as the subject. > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
