Hi sage-devel, If I want to draw a 3d point of size 100 in Sage, I do :
sage: point((2,3,4), size=100) but for a 2d point, the argument is not the same : sage: point((2,3), pointsize=100) In the ticket #8599 (which needs review), I propose to change ``pointsize`` for ``size`` because I think ``pointsize`` is kind of redundant and ``size`` is not ambiguous since it is an argument of a function called ``point``. If anybody have an counter-argument, please say so before #8599 gets a positive review by somebody! Cheers, Sébastien [1] http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8599 -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
