On Mar 17, 2010, at 11:46 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
So sage built, but it may or may not work. And you're building it on
another machine, but it may or not build. What was the point of
this post?
Thanks for clarifying. So apparently you feel David should have
waited to post something (hopefully!) like: "Sage built on Solaris
SPARC and doctests passed." or at least "no new doctest failures
happened"?
Yes. This post contains nothing "actionable".
Actually, I think all such posts belong on sage-release; all 1000+
subscribers to sage-devel don't need to know every time Sage alpha X
builds or brakes on system Y. (Of course, these replies are invaluable
for the release manager, so I don't want to discourage people from
sending them in.) Fortunately all such posts usually occur in one
thread, so I can delete them in bulk when they show up on sage-devel.
- Robert
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
