Martin Rubey wrote:
Personally I have a bit of a problem understanding why I need to
worry about a program starting up in less than 2 s, when I might run
something on it which will take at least one order of magnitude
longer, and probably several order of magnitudes longer.

I can only say why it matters for me:

<SNIP>
mar...@rubey-laptop:~/Documents/sage-4.1.1-linux-Ubuntu_9.04-i686-Linux$ time echo 
"2+2;" | ./sage
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Sage Version 4.1.1, Release Date: 2009-08-14                       |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.        |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Loading Sage library. Current Mercurial branch is: combinat
sage: sage: Exiting SAGE (CPU time 0m0.26s, Wall time 0m0.84s).

real    0m18.403s
user    0m5.144s
sys     0m1.304s


Martin

OK, 18 s is a bit more significant. 1.5 s I have a bit more of a problem with worrying about.

I'm going to start another thread on this specific issue of startup time.

Dave




--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to