How about that and 90% coverage? Or 85% if 90% is too ambitious. -Marshall
On Mar 2, 1:01 pm, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: > On Mar 1, 2010, at 4:26 AM, William Stein wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I've created this trac wiki page with a subset of the 10 most > > important current bug/issues in Sage, according to votes in this > > thread: > > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/stab1 > > > These are all bugs/issues that many people care about. None are > > highly specialized. > > > So if anybody has some time to donate to working on Sage, and you want > > to make an impact that people will definitely appreciate, work on one > > of the bugs listed athttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/stab1 > > > After seeing the actual bugs, I no longer see the wisdom of making a > > specific release targeting them. The problem is that they are all > > potentially hard, and there is no telling when they will all be > > resolved. However, listing them all together and seeing that a lot of > > people care about them will help encourage people to work on them. > > Just a thought, would knocking out this important list of bugs be a > good goal for Sage 5.0? > > - Robert -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
