Dan Drake wrote:
> I think I would be very happy if I wrote my book and someone else wanted > to include a version of one of the chapters into their own work, even if > that work otherwise used ordinary copyright, and if readers of the new > book didn't have access to "Transparent" copies, or if they had to > visit creativecommons.org to see the license. So in this one instance, > the CC license strikes me as better than GFDL. You might be interested in the CC-by license, then. Then your chapter could be included in a GFDL book and also in a CC-by-sa book (and a CC-by book, etc.). I thought David Wiley had a good blog post about the propagation and reuse problems of specific copy-left licenses requiring that derivative works carry the exact same license: http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/347 Thanks, Jason -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
