On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: > David Joyner wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Jason Grout >> <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: >>>
... > I guess the situation changes if some example code from the document is > actually incorporated into Sage. For example, if in the book, I have a > sample function that draws a volumetric data visualization in the > document, or if there was a simple calculus function that wasn't already > in Sage, then there would be problems if we tried to put those into Sage > itself, unless I explicitly dual-licensed the code. Is that correct? I agree that dual-licensing makes sense in that circumstance. However, depending on how you define "simple" it is possible that the sample function does not meet the creative work criteria and so was so simple it was not copyrightable in the first place. > > Thanks, > > Jason > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
