Tim Lahey wrote: > > On Aug 23, 2009, at 5:54 PM, William Stein wrote: > >> Unfortunately it doesn't mean that. I think it just means that "ln" >> is a shortcut for "log", but otherwise works just like "log". > > > Is it possible in this change to have function for ln that will > print to LaTeX and just call log behind the scenes? >
Of course. That sounds reasonable. I can see students being confused that they typed "ln" and it said back "log". So +1. Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
