On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 2:54 PM, William Stein<wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Tim Lahey <tim.la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Aug 23, 2009, at 5:25 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > So since Tim's from Waterloo that might explain his preference for ln.
>>
>>
>> I preferred ln(x) well before I learned Maple. Plus, all my textbooks
>> used
>> ln(x).

OK, Wikipedia has a pretty useful discussion.  It mentions 'As
recently as 1984, Paul Halmos in his "automathography" I Want to Be a
Mathematician heaped contempt on what he considered the childish "ln"
notation, which he said no mathematician had ever used.'  I read that
book, so maybe that is one reason I don't like "ln".    The Wikipedia
page also says:

"If, as in "log(x)", the base is not given explicitly, it may be
understood implicitly by discipline:

    * Mathematicians understand "log(x)" to mean log_e(x). Calculus
textbooks will occasionally write "log(x)" to represent "log_10(x)".

    * Many engineers, biologists, astronomers, and some others write
only "ln(x)" or "log_e(x)" when they mean the natural logarithm of x,
and take "log(x)" to mean log_10(x) or, in computer science, log2(x).

  * In most commonly used computer programming languages, including C,
C++, Java, Haskell, Fortran, Python, Ruby, and BASIC, the "log"
function returns the natural logarithm. The base-10 function, if it is
available, is generally "log10."

This chaos, historically, originates from the fact that the natural
logarithm has nice mathematical properties (such as its derivative
being 1/x, and having a simple definition), while the base 10
logarithms, or decimal logarithms, were more convenient for speeding
calculations (back when they were used for that purpose)."




---

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to