On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:51 PM, rjf <fate...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Aug 9, 11:15 pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > ..... > > > > ECL is massively better than CLISP, and is also the *only* other lisp > that > > is currently supported and builds 100% from source code. Both CMUCL and > > SBCL are immediately ruled out just because of that reason. This is one > of > > the DoD requirements for Sage -- they absolutely will never consider > using > > CMUCL or SBCL (I have asked). > > > > Could you perhaps quote for us the DoD requirements? (and who in DoD > requires them).
No, I definitely can't. Sorry I can't go into any further details. -- William > I have never heard such a statement before, and wonder about the > context for this, as well as whether there are other requirements. (I > have, in the past, received funding from DARPA, Office of Naval > Research, Army Research Office, as well as other non-DoD sources.) > > Thanks > > RJF > > > RJF > > > -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
