On Aug 9, 11:15 pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
.....
>
> ECL is massively better than CLISP, and is also the *only* other lisp that
> is currently supported and builds 100% from source code. Both CMUCL and
> SBCL are immediately ruled out just because of that reason. This is one of
> the DoD requirements for Sage -- they absolutely will never consider using
> CMUCL or SBCL (I have asked).
>
Could you perhaps quote for us the DoD requirements? (and who in DoD
requires them).
I have never heard such a statement before, and wonder about the
context for this, as well as whether there are other requirements. (I
have, in the past, received funding from DARPA, Office of Naval
Research, Army Research Office, as well as other non-DoD sources.)
Thanks
RJF
RJF
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
