Note that there was already a Python+Sage talk at a recent SIAM conference http://fdoperez.blogspot.com/2008/07/python-tools-for-science-go-to-siam.html http://www.ams.org/ams/siam-2008.html#python which was apparently very popular. It may be that those who attended the SIAM conference and who are also interested in Python are basically the same group of people who will attend the Scipy conference. If so, a "no" vote could simply mean that they just want to hear something different.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:39 AM, William Stein<wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Harald Schilly<harald.schi...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Jul 1, 12:57 pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> http://fdoperez.blogspot.com/2009/06/scipy-advanced-tutorials-results... >>> >>> I don't know if I should interpret this as: >> >> my interpretation is, that people simply want to learn more about >> those tools which they already know about. sage isn't part of the >> scipy community and therefore doesn't fit. without any details or >> comments i wouldn't think about anything else. > > That's very consistent with the license remark I made, since the scipy > community generally tends to avoid GPL'd projects for reasons that make > a lot of sense for them. > > -- William > > -- > William Stein > Associate Professor of Mathematics > University of Washington > http://wstein.org > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
