On Jun 24, 2009, at 1:57 AM, Maurizio wrote:
> > I agree. We could do something like plotting all the deltas with a > stem plot and then superimposing the rest of the plot > > Maurizio > It might give the wrong impression. > On 24 Giu, 04:21, David Roe <r...@math.harvard.edu> wrote: >> One way would be to have a vertical ray that doesn't change the >> scaling of >> the rest of the graph (just goes to the top of the viewing >> window). Not >> precisely accurate, but better than nothing. >> David If you put arrows on the top, it might give the right impression. However, I'd like plotting Dirac deltas to be optional. So, if you're plotting something with Dirac deltas and other functions, you don't need to sift through and remove the deltas before plotting. Cheers, Tim. --- Tim Lahey PhD Candidate, Systems Design Engineering University of Waterloo http://www.linkedin.com/in/timlahey --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
