On Jun 23, 2009, at 5:45 PM, Maurizio wrote:

>
> Many kudos for this!
>
> Honestly, I don't actually know whether it means that much, but at
> this point I think that it could be useful for us to follow
> Mathematica in defining two different functions: Heaviside which is
> undefined in 0 and that is defined as the function whose derivative is
> the Dirac Delta ( see 
> http://functions.wolfram.com/GeneralizedFunctions/HeavisideTheta/02/
> ) and UnitStep, which is the piecewise version of this function, so
> it's numerically defined everywhere. It would be great if one could
> possibly change the desired value in 0.
>
> I think it doesn't hurt now to carry on both, because it shouldn't be
> that difficult to merge them in future if we don't see any usefulness
> in having them separated.
>
> I can see that Maple use Heaviside undefined in 0, and then let the
> user the chance to convert it to a piecewise function if desired. This
> looks a bit unfriendly to me, and doesn't bring any real advantage.
>

Technically, the Heaviside can be considered to be a piecewise function
where H(x) = 0 x<0, H(x) = 1, x>0. Maple just has a conversion between
the various representations. It comes in handy when there are multiple
pieces.

> By the way, how do we represent Dirac Delta? I know that it's not
> defined in 0, but I want to point out an example. Please, remember
> that the Fourier transform of any periodic function (although the use
> of the transform is not proper in case of periodic functions, I know)
> is formed by the summation of Dirac Deltas at different location in
> the frequency spectrum, and I would love to have a graphical
> representation of the spectrum of a signal. So, do you think we can
> find a convenient way of plotting delta? I don't know much of them,
> but I'm sure there are many similar physical problems, that would take
> advantage of plotting deltas.

Ploting Dirac deltas doesn't make much sense given its definition.  
When I
work with Dirac deltas and their derivatives, I just ignore them for  
plotting
purposes. I only plot their integrals and higher.

Cheers,

Tim.

---
Tim Lahey
PhD Candidate, Systems Design Engineering
University of Waterloo
http://www.linkedin.com/in/timlahey


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to