On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Rob Beezer <goo...@beezer.cotse.net> wrote: > > +1
Since I can't remember ever using the "typeset" command, another +1 to me. William > > On May 20, 9:49 am, John H Palmieri <jhpalmier...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Should we deprecate (or altogether eliminate) the typeset command? >> It's defined in sage.misc.latex, and right now it's only imported in >> the notebook. Essentially the same effect can be achieved by using >> 'view'. As someone pointed out, there are lots of almost equivalent >> pretty printing commands, so getting rid of one of them seems like a >> good idea. >> >> (The details: the definition of 'typeset' is a one-liner with no >> docstring, and so it can easily be replaced the two places where it is >> called in the code.) >> >> John > > > -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
