On May 14, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Gonzalo Tornaria wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Robert Bradshaw > <rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> On May 14, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Craig Citro wrote: >> >>>> I'm currently building/doctesting with (1) in place, and I'll >>>> report >>>> back soon. gen.pyx passes all tests, so I suspect we're probably >>>> safe. >>>> >>> >>> Doctesting is done, and no troubles -- so I've posted a patch here: >>> >>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6039 >> >> This is the right fix. Looks good--are you sure we don't use pari's >> some anywhere else? > > Robert, > > would it actually make sense to have cython emit an error about > multiply defined symbols, or symbols which override python defaults, > instead of silently chosing one over the other? > > This would seem to me the right fix, unless I'm missing something > obvious...
No, I don't think so. Then it would become even less like Python where I can define my own sum and it "silently" gets used instead of the Python one. Perhaps we could emit a warning though. - Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
