On Apr 23, 5:51 am, "Georg S. Weber" <georgswe...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Michael,
Hi Georg,
> probably you did. But just to be sure: did you really do tests with
> the singular spkg I put a while ago at
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/weberg/spkg/
> ?
I will take it for a spin. I am pretty sure we need to push these
changes upstream.
> There are quite some changes in it (ask me if you have specific
> questions), one or the other of which might possibly help. The oMalloc
> package also brings its own "testsuite", what are its results? The
> problem for me to work myself on this issue, is that I do have a
> MacIntel Core2Duo, but I haven't got OS X 10.5 available at all, and I
> do not intend to buy one, or to install it. (Waiting for 10.6 to come
> out.) And OS X 10.4 does not seem to be really "64-bit ready". Working
> remote might be a possibility, but I can't promise to spend much time
> on it.
William can give you an account on a 10.5 box that is capable of
building 64 bit binaries. It is indeed the main test box for us to do
so.
> Cheers,
> gsw
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
