On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:31 AM, mabshoff wrote: > On Apr 9, 11:01 am, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Arnaud Bergeron >> <aberge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > <SNIP> > >>> Or simply, to keep the existing simplicity, change %myhandler to >>> call >>> sage_myhandler and rename the existing ones. There is very little >>> probability of other projects using sage_<something> as a name. > > Yeah, this is a great idea, but I would make it even *more* unlikely > to hit a name collision by naming it > > sage_handler_$FOO
I think this is a great idea too. Perhaps notebook_eval_FOO since we're looking at factoring the notebook out. - Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
