On Apr 9, 11:01 am, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Arnaud Bergeron <aberge...@gmail.com> wrote:

<SNIP>

> > Or simply, to keep the existing simplicity, change %myhandler to call
> > sage_myhandler and rename the existing ones.  There is very little
> > probability of other projects using sage_<something> as a name.

Yeah, this is a great idea, but I would make it even *more* unlikely
to hit a name collision by naming it

 sage_handler_$FOO

> > Note that I am a bit favourable to the register_handler idea though.
> > Something tells me it is not a good idea to mix the interpretation
> > environment and the interpreted environment.  Especially if it is only
> > done for python and sage modes.  But since I am not proposing to do
> > the work, I will not complain either way.
>
> I am currently a bit swamped with other things, but it's on my todo to
> get a useful notebook spkg package and I will also fix this, unless
> someone else will do it earlier, which is very well possible. :)

FYI: Mike Hansen has prototype stand alone notebook code using plone,
but that code is far from being ready at the moment. It reuses some of
the existing notebook and javascript code AFAIK. It is not yet
available and given that it is entwined with some other projects, i.e.
a interact rewrite that adds a state to the interact widget that
allows multiple users to use the same code, it will be probably post
Sage 4.0 when this will happen. Sage 4.0 should drop before SD 15 in
roughly 5 weeks, so it isn't too far off :)

> Obviously, as you all pointed out, there are several ways to get this
> fixed, so Iet's wait for William's or other sage devs opinions on this
> one.
>
> Ondrej

Cheers,

Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to