Hi, On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:52:18 -0300 Golam Mortuza Hossain <gmhoss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (3) Implement _latex_ method for "diff", "integrate", .... > within Sage itself. Assuming, pynac-based symbolics in Sage > is in near-horizon, one would need these methods anyway. > > At this point, I think, it would be better to hear from those > who are involved with pynac. In particular, whether some > of these _latex_ methods are already being implemented! You're right, these methods are needed. These have been in the todo list [1] since Nick Alexander pointed them out to me on IRC. I fixed the latexing of variables then, the functions and derivatives need more work. [1] http://wiki.sagemath.org/symbolics/pynac_todo For the variables, I just needed to call latex_variable_name from sage.misc.latex. If the python implementations for the other cases are already there, it will just be as simple as adding the python calls in the proper places in pynac. I can only encourage you to go ahead and implement how you think latex'ing of symbolic functions, derivatives, etc. should work. I will then try to use your implementation from pynac. Thanks. Burcin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
