Ronan Paixão wrote:
[> Pat LeSmithe wrote:]
>> Of course, concerns about security and usability may well restrict the
>> privileges to a specific subset of Sage's commands and fraction of
>> server resources.  Still, it would be great if Wikipedia entries, say,
>> could include pertinent, pedagogical "gadgets" to illustrate concepts
>> which are difficult to convey in a static setting.  (This sidesteps the
>> issue of whether Wikipedia would or should ever allow these objects.)
>> Perhaps, much of the work could be delegated to code that compiles and
>> runs in the ever-more-capable browser.
>>
> Too bad there isn't something like Pythonscript to use as if it were
> Javascript. Maybe someone could do some sort of browser extension for
> firefox?

In trying to answer a slightly different question, I just found pyjamas,
an Apache-licensed Pythonic analogue of Google Web Toolkit (GWT):

http://pyjs.org/

Could it be relevant?


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to