On Jan 12, 2:17 pm, adrian <nihilalienumcr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Adrian,
> I just asked the system administrator, and we do have an ultra sparc
> IV. And thus we could try a binary.
I just check and I am building Sage on the following Sparc:
System Configuration: Sun Microsystems sun4u Sun Blade 2500
System clock frequency: 160 MHZ
Memory size: 4GB
==================================== CPUs
====================================
E$ CPU CPU
CPU Freq Size Implementation Mask Status
Location
--- -------- ---------- --------------------- ----- ------
--------
0 1280 MHz 1MB SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIIi 2.4 on-line
MB/0
1 1280 MHz 1MB SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIIi 2.4 on-line
MB/1
So a US VI shouldn't be needed and I assume the binary would run on
anything that is US III compatible.
> That would be great!
>
> Peace.
> -Adrian.
I spend some of yesterday with building a gcc 4.3.2 based toolchain
for Solaris 10/x86 and now the numpy/scipy issues are gone and I am
down to the following doctest failures:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/coding/code_bounds.py # 2 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage/sage/combinat/schubert_polynomial.py # 0
doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/lisp.py # 1 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/singular.py # 1 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage/sage/libs/pari/gen.pyx # 2 doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage/sage/libs/symmetrica/sc.pxi # Segfault
sage -t devel/sage/sage/libs/symmetrica/sb.pxi # 0 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage/sage/plot/plot.py # 2 doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/
polynomial_element.pyx # 1 doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx # 1 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage/sage/tests/book_stein_modform.py # 3
doctests failed
All of the above boils down to a couple bugs:
* symmetrica interface issues
* pexpect oddities
* pow() behaving different for negative values when exponent is non-
integral
* clib issues - inf vs. Infinity
* pari + huge malloc (2TB+) segfaults at exit *after* passing the
test after failing the alloc
At least for the pow() issue as well as "inf vs. infinity" I have
workarounds/fixes in mind, so expect the number to go down soon :)
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
