On Dec 11, 9:50 am, "John Cremona" <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All well on 32-bit Suse except for this, which looks similar to but
> not identical to Jaap's. On second thoughts (after pasting it in) it
> does look the same as Jaap's, now that the lines wrap differently.
>
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py"
> **********************************************************************
> File
> "/local/jec/sage-3.2.2.alpha1/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polyno
> mial_ideal.py",
> line 244, in __main__.example_0
> Failed example:
> S = R.quotient((x**Integer(2) + y**Integer(2),
> Integer(17)),names=('a', 'b')); (a, b,) =
> S._first_ngens(Integer(2))###line 58:_sage_ >>> S.<a,b> =
> R.quotient((x^2 + y^2, 17))
> Expected:
> verbose 0 ... Warning: falling back to very slow toy implementation.
> Got nothing
> **********************************************************************
> 1 items had failures:
> 1 of 47 in __main__.example_0
> ***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
>
> [7.1 s]
> exit code: 1024
>
> John
Hi John,
this is a known problem if M2 is installed, i.e. GBases over ZZ
automatically use M2 if it is installed. There is a ticket in trac
already to fix this, We can make that test optional until the issue is
resolved.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
