All well on 32-bit Suse except for this, which looks similar to but
not identical to Jaap's. On second thoughts (after pasting it in) it
does look the same as Jaap's, now that the lines wrap differently.
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py"
**********************************************************************
File
"/local/jec/sage-3.2.2.alpha1/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py",
line 244, in __main__.example_0
Failed example:
S = R.quotient((x**Integer(2) + y**Integer(2),
Integer(17)),names=('a', 'b')); (a, b,) =
S._first_ngens(Integer(2))###line 58:_sage_ >>> S.<a,b> =
R.quotient((x^2 + y^2, 17))
Expected:
verbose 0 ... Warning: falling back to very slow toy implementation.
Got nothing
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 47 in __main__.example_0
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
[7.1 s]
exit code: 1024
John
2008/12/10 mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com>:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes 3.2.2.alpha1, somewhat later than I had hoped. We have about
> a week left in the development cycle, so stay tuned for more alphas.
> There are a couple must have tickets left for 3.2.2 that are not yet
> merged, two of which are
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
