On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 4:26 PM, bourbabis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello folks. > > I'm afraid this is may be not possible, but however > here is a suggestion. I strive to compile Sage > on a somewhat weak/outdated hardware. > Actually, the problem is not at all that > compilation as a whole takes a very long time, but the > fact that when a compilation of a given package which requires a > very long time fails, the already successfully compiled > objects are removed after launching compilation again. > I think it could be a enhancement if > possibility exists (regarding the few "critical" packages) to > keep intermediate successfully compiled stuff. > "Critical" packages seem to be : Atlas, Linbox, the > final package running Cython. > > Is it possible or is it unrealistic ?
It's already easily possible. However, your question as stated simply does not make sense to me. Why are you trying to building again after compilation of a given package fails? Won't it just fail again? Are you modifying the package in the meantime, then trying to rebuild it? Could you please clarify your question a lot? Thanks. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
