This is also the unique doctest failure under RHEL5 on my 64-bit Opteron box (upgraded from rc0).
Kiran On Dec 1, 10:35 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mabshoff wrote: > > > On Dec 1, 7:27 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> mabshoff wrote: > > > <SNIP> > > >> Upgrade from rc0 on Fedora 9 has the known issues in > >> sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py > > >> Jaap > > > Hi Jaap, > > > can you repost the output? I made another one of those GBasis over ZZ > > computations optional for now since I observed different results on > > various boxen. > > sage -t "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py" > ********************************************************************** > File > "/home/jaap/work/downloads/sage-3.2.1.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomi > al/multi_polynomial_ideal.py", line 58: > sage: S.<a,b> = R.quotient((x^2 + y^2, 17)) > Expected: > verbose 0 ... Warning: falling back to very slow toy implementation. > Got nothing > ********************************************************************** > 1 items had failures: > 1 of 47 in __main__.example_0 > ***Test Failed*** 1 failures. > For whitespace errors, see the file > /home/jaap/downloads/sage-3.2.1.alpha2/tmp/.doctest_multi_polynomial_ideal. py > [13.6 s] > exit code: 1024 > > The other M2 issue seems to be gone! > > Jaap > > > Cheers, > > > Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
