On Aug 19, 12:12 am, Stan Schymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Stan, > As mentioned before, the "sage -upgrade" from sage 3.0.5 did not work > for me, but a fresh compilation of the sage-3.1.1.tar into a new > directory worked fine on my PowerBook Pro 2.4 GHz with os 10.4.11. I > am trying it out right now and my notebooks seem to work faster than > with the previous version (sage 3.0.5.). We have been told by various people that the startup time of Sage on OSX 10.4 is much better when build locally since then the linker does not end up looking for libraries in a lot of places because the location of the Sage install moved. > "sage -testall" gave: > > Ran 52 tests in 8.711s > > PASSED (successes=52) > > Thanks for a great software! The above is only the doctests for DSage and there should have been another 900+ tests run. > Stan In general it seems that OSX 10.4 is sufficiently different in its behavior than 10.5. Thus a bunch of upgrade issues exist that do not happen on OSX 10.5. I am setting up a laptop with 10.4 so that I can chase down those issues. Cheers, Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
