> At every stage of this process, you should be able to find help in > answering questions that come up. Whether you can find someone else > to chip in and contribute to the work depends on who else is excited > about getting giac into Sage. But you should feel free to go ahead > and go through the steps of making giac an optional spkg even if > nobody currently involved in Sage development is enthusiastic enough > to help out. If it's important enough to you to put in the work, go > for it!
Thanks a lot David for writing this up! I can say for myself that I am interested in having giac in Sage, as it can do some things and do it fast and it's just good to have different approaches to the same thing, e.g. giac, maxima, sympy, Gary's symbolics. So that we can get all of them to equal footing and then see which approach is the most viable. I don't have time to do giac.spkg though, but I will test it and report bugs if you do. Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
