Hi, Michael, On May 28, 10:59 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 28, 4:08 pm, Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was reading the Sage Programming Guide this morning (excellent read, > > by the way), and the the end of section 2.4.1 mentions that "Using > > sage_search from the Sage prompt . . . one can easily find . . . > > keywords and in the case of todo: not implemented use the results to > > motivate further development on Sage." This got me thinking about the > > ways I've been looking for areas to which to contribute; if there were > > even a note, let alone a search field, on sagemath.org, that > > referenced/searched (respectively) sage_search, that would provide > > another way for folks to see where they might apply their effort. > > The new website has a search field and IIRC it is/can be restricted to > the Sage documentation. See > > http://lite.sagemath.org/search.html
Maybe a blurb letting people know the documentation includes #todo snippets would be enough. Currently, unless a would-be contributor has already read the Programming Guide, or has looked through code enough to have come across such a string (and maybe not even in that case), will he or she know these indicators of future development exist. Perhaps, instead, to minimize frontpage noise, a fourth bullet or another sub-bullet on http://lite.sagemath.org/development.html would be more fitting. Daniel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
