On May 28, 4:08 pm, Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, folks,

Hi Daniel,

> I was reading the Sage Programming Guide this morning (excellent read,
> by the way), and the the end of section 2.4.1 mentions that "Using
> sage_search from the Sage prompt . . . one can easily find . . .
> keywords and in the case of todo: not implemented use the results to
> motivate further development on Sage."  This got me thinking about the
> ways I've been looking for areas to which to contribute; if there were
> even a note, let alone a search field, on sagemath.org, that
> referenced/searched (respectively) sage_search, that would provide
> another way for folks to see where they might apply their effort.

The new website has a search field and IIRC it is/can be restricted to
the Sage documentation. See

http://lite.sagemath.org/search.html

> Certainly, this doesn't obviate the need to install Sage, nor to talk
> to developers and users; the former makes sage_search available while
> the latter captures planned functionality that might not exist in a
> docstring.  Does it add value, and make extended use of the
> documentation, though?
>
> Daniel

Cheers,

Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to