On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > William Stein wrote: >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Nick, do you honestly actually use the matrix(...) command in your >>>> code >>>> all the time without explicitly giving the base ring? >>> All the time? No. I just checked one of my working directories >>> (code for working with analytic abelian varieties and principal >>> polarizations). Of ~60 matrix() calls, ~6 do not specify the ring. >> >> Wow! In that case I revise my viewpoint on this matter. That's >> really interesting. It is amazing how many things in Sage were >> written to make Sage easier for "random undergrads", but turn >> it to be really loved by working researchers in the trenches. > > > What is your new viewpoint?
Change the echelon_form command. -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
