Hi,

A while ago we had a huge thread on sage-devel with lots of criticism
that I dutifly
listened to which resulted in the current sagemath.org frontpage.  Every
sentence of the current sagemath.org page got carefully written and rewritten
numerous times based on *your* feedback.

Recently I asked Harald Schilly to spend some time and create a new
fresh website design for Sage.  His new design is here:

   http://lite.sagemath.org/

It rocks!   It just looks modern.

However, please, look at it, and criticize it!  People *will* decide
between using Sage and not based on just the web page, so this
really does matter.     I assure you that we can take
any criticism you throw our way.     But please take a look,
show the demo page to your friends, get feedback, etc.  Now
is the time.

I'll start.  Since these are all suggestions for ways to change
lite.sagemath.org,
perhaps for the worse, please feel free to criticize them too.

1. I will start out by saying that the page looks too blue to me; so
blue it is hard for me to look at it.  If the background were a bit lighter
I personally would find the page vastly easier to read.  Right
now it hurts my eyes.

2. At the top right it says "please report problems of new website".
This doesn't sound like correct English.  Maybe just delete "of new website".

3. The title is "Sage Computer Algebra System".  I personally really
don't like the term "computer algebra system" to refer to Sage, since I
think it unduly limits Sage to just "computer algebra", though Sage does
much much more than that.  That's why I like the term "open source
mathematical software" much more.

4. I think the dash in "open-source" on the intro page is perhaps technically
correct but is completely not needed, since nobody uses it and there is
no chance of confusion.

5. This sentence on the opening page is horrible: "It provides an entire in
itself closed distribution of various software packages and is actively
developed by many people."   It needs to be rewritten a lot.  "closed
distribution"
doesn't sound right at all -- it suggests "closed source".  Maybe "complete"?


Thanks!!

 William


-- 
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to