On Apr 21, 6:48 am, "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:22 PM, mabshoff wrote:
<SNIP>
>
> GCL uses the C compiler directly. I am not suggesting that GCL is
> necessarily the "right" lisp for Sage (or even that Sage needs a lisp
> compiler at all) but I do rather think you should give GCL another
> try. I would be glad to try to help you debug the problems on Solaris.
In both cases the current CVS checkout out from savannah blows up on
Solaris 9 and 10 in the same spot:
Solaris 9:
# Subconfigure of BFD done
# ------------------------
#
checking size of long... 4
checking size of int... 4
checking size of short... 2
checking size of char... 1
checking for number of bits in char... 8
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... yes
checking for sbrk... yes
checking for randomized sbrk... no
checking for required object alignment... 8
checking for C extension variable alignment... __attribute__ ((aligned
(8)))
checking TYPE_BITS macro... 0xff09
checking sizeof struct contblock... 8
checking for pagewidth... 13
checking DBEGIN... 0x20000
checking CSTACK_ADDRESS... 0xffbfffff
checking NEG_CSTACK_ADDRESS... yes
checking finding CSTACK_ALIGNMENT... 8
checking CSTACK_DIRECTION... -1
checking for shared library/C stack ceiling to heap... failed
Solaris 10:
#
# Subconfigure of BFD done
# ------------------------
#
checking size of long... 4
checking size of int... 4
checking size of short... 2
checking size of char... 1
checking for number of bits in char... 8
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... yes
checking for sbrk... yes
checking for randomized sbrk... no
checking for required object alignment... 8
checking for C extension variable alignment... __attribute__ ((aligned
(8)))
checking TYPE_BITS macro... 0xff09
checking sizeof struct contblock... 8
checking for pagewidth... 13
checking DBEGIN... 0x20000
checking CSTACK_ADDRESS... 0xffbfffff
checking NEG_CSTACK_ADDRESS... yes
checking finding CSTACK_ALIGNMENT... 8
checking CSTACK_DIRECTION... -1
checking for shared library/C stack ceiling to heap... ./configure: !:
not found
usage: tail [+/-[n][lbc][f]] [file]
tail [+/-[n][l][r|f]] [file]
failed
This second failure leaves me to believe that someone is assuming a
version of GNU tail. I am using a gcc 4.2.2 compiled from sources both
times.
> Regards,
> Bill Page.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---