On Apr 5, 3:52 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi John, > I only had two test failures after a successful build: > > sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/prandom.py > sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/inline_fortran.py > > In detail: > > sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/prandom.py > ********************************************************************** > File "/home/jec/sage-3.0.alpha1/tmp/prandom.py", line 285: > sage: [vonmisesvariate(1.0r, 3.0r) for i in range(1, 5)] > Expected: > [0.89832863935542584, 0.67180300070412846, 2.0308777524813397, > 1.7143252537251459] > Got: > [0.89832863935542584, 0.67180300070412846, 2.0308777524813397, > 1.7143252537251454] > ********************************************************************** Thanks John for this report. This is a numerical issue that is now #2806 - a patch will be up shortly. > > sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/inline_fortran.py > ********************************************************************** > File "/home/jec/sage-3.0.alpha1/tmp/inline_fortran.py", line 28: > sage: test_fortran(s) # -- requires fortran > Expected nothing > Got: > Found executable /home/jec/sage-3.0.alpha1/local/bin/sage-g77_shared > Found executable /home/jec/sage-3.0.alpha1/local/bin/sage_fortran > Found executable /usr/bin/ld > Found executable /usr/bin/ar > Found executable /usr/bin/ranlib > <BLANKLINE> > ********************************************************************** > File "/home/jec/sage-3.0.alpha1/tmp/inline_fortran.py", line 31: > sage: fib(n,int(10)) # -- requires fortran > Exception raised: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/home/jec/sage-3.0.alpha1/local/lib/python2.5/doctest.py", > line 1212, in __run > compileflags, 1) in test.globs > File "<doctest __main__.example_0[7]>", line 1, in <module> > fib(n,int(Integer(10))) # -- requires fortran###line 31: > sage: fib(n,int(10)) # -- requires fortran > NameError: name 'fib' is not defined > ********************************************************************** > File "/home/jec/sage-3.0.alpha1/tmp/inline_fortran.py", line 32: > sage: n # -- requires fortran > Expected: > array([ 0., 1., 1., 2., 3., 5., 8., 13., 21., 34.]) > Got: > array([ 0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9.]) > ********************************************************************** > <SNIP> > > Ok, there is trouble in paradise: > > > #2804: ssmod.py doctest failure - this is likely LinBox related. It > > happens only on occasion and I didn *never* hit in on 20+ full doctest > > runs on sage.math. Gary did hit it on his Dual QuadCore a couple > > times. We have a patch for this problem, so alpha2 should contain a fix. Another problem popped up: Linking the linbox_wrapper library on OSX 10.4 fails due to the commentator. Damn commentator! ;) > > #2802: inline_fortran.py doctest failure - we are unsure *what* caused > > it. It did pop up at some point and I didn't pay attention until a day > > later when I realized that it was reproducible. We suspect #2746 - any > > ideas Tim? > > > Cheers, > > > Michael Cheers, Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
