I went through the link. It also returns perm_c and perm_r and the solution is represented as
Pr * (R^-1) * A * Pc = L * U It is similar to one returned by scipy >>> lu.perm_r array([0, 2, 1, 3], dtype=int32) >>> lu.perm_c array([2, 0, 1, 3], dtype=int32) I think it doesn't support square matrix too. Link <https://github.com/scikit-umfpack/scikit-umfpack/blob/ce77944bce003a29771ae07be182af348c3eadce/scikits/umfpack/interface.py#L199C1-L200C81> On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 at 6:17:26 PM UTC+5:30 Max Alekseyev wrote: > One more option would be umfack via scikits.umfpack: > > https://scikit-umfpack.github.io/scikit-umfpack/reference/scikits.umfpack.UmfpackLU.html > > Regards, > Max > On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 at 7:07:53 AM UTC-5 Animesh Shree wrote: > >> One thing I would like to suggest. >> >> We can provide multiple ways to compute the sparse LU >> 1. scipy >> 2. sage original implementation in src.sage.matrix.matrix2.LU >> <https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/acbe15dcd87085d4fa177705ec01107b53a026ef/src/sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx#L13160> >> (Note >> - link >> <https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/acbe15dcd87085d4fa177705ec01107b53a026ef/src/sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx#L13249C1-L13254C51> >> ) >> 3. convert to dense then factor >> >> It will be up to user to choose based on the complexity. >> Is it fine? >> >> On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 at 4:30:51 PM UTC+5:30 Animesh Shree >> wrote: >> >>> Thank you for reminding >>> I went through. >>> We need to Decompose A11 only and rest can be calculated via taking >>> inverse of L11 or U11. >>> Here A11 is square matrix and we can use scipy to decompose square >>> matrices. >>> Am I correct? >>> >>> New and only problem that I see is the returned LU decomposition of >>> scipy's splu is calculated by full permutation of row and column as pointed >>> out by *Nils Bruin*. We will be returning row and col permutation >>> array/matrix separately instead of single row permutation which sage >>> usage generally for plu decomposition. >>> User will have to manage row and col permutations. >>> or else >>> We can return handler function for reconstruction of matrix from L, U >>> & p={perm_r, perm_c} >>> or >>> We can leave that to user >>> User will have to permute its input data according to perm_c (like : >>> perm_c * input) before using the perm_r^(-1) * L * U >>> as perm_r^(-1) * L * U is PLU decomposition of Original_matrix*perm_c >>> >>> https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.sparse.linalg.SuperLU.html >>> >>> A = Pr^(-1) *L*U * Pc^(-1) # as told by *Nils Bruin* >>> or >>> scipy's splu will not do. >>> >>> On Tuesday, February 27, 2024 at 11:57:02 PM UTC+5:30 Dima Pasechnik >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 27 February 2024 17:25:51 GMT, 'Animesh Shree' via sage-devel < >>>> sage-...@googlegroups.com> wrote: >>>> >This works good if input is square and I also checked on your idea of >>>> >padding zeros for non square matrices. >>>> >I am currently concerned about the permutation matrix and L, U in case >>>> of >>>> >padded 0s. Because if we pad then how will they affect the outputs, so >>>> that >>>> >we can extract p,l,u for unpadded matrix. >>>> >>>> please read details I wrote on how to deal with the non-square case. >>>> There is no padding needed. >>>> >>>> >>>> > >>>> >On Tuesday, February 27, 2024 at 10:03:25 PM UTC+5:30 Dima Pasechnik >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On 27 February 2024 15:34:20 GMT, 'Animesh Shree' via sage-devel < >>>> >> sage-...@googlegroups.com> wrote: >>>> >> >I tried scipy which uses superLU. We get the result but there is >>>> little >>>> >> bit >>>> >> >of issue. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> >--For Dense-- >>>> >> >The dense matrix factorization gives this output using permutation >>>> matrix >>>> >> >sage: a = Matrix(RDF, [[1, 0],[2, 1]], sparse=True) >>>> >> >sage: a >>>> >> >[1.0 0.0] >>>> >> >[2.0 1.0] >>>> >> >sage: p,l,u = a.dense_matrix().LU() >>>> >> >sage: p >>>> >> >[0.0 1.0] >>>> >> >[1.0 0.0] >>>> >> >sage: l >>>> >> >[1.0 0.0] >>>> >> >[0.5 1.0] >>>> >> >sage: u >>>> >> >[ 2.0 1.0] >>>> >> >[ 0.0 -0.5] >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> >> you'd probably want to convert the permutation matrix into a >>>> permutation. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >--For Sparse-- >>>> >> >But the scipy LU decomposition uses permutations which involves >>>> taking >>>> >> >transpose, also the output permutations are represented as array. >>>> >> >>>> >> It is very normal to represent permutations as arrays. >>>> >> One can reconstruct the permutation matrix from such an array >>>> trivially >>>> >> (IIRC, Sage even has a function for it) >>>> >> >>>> >> I am not sure what you mean by "taking transpose". >>>> >> >>>> >> >sage: p,l,u = a.LU(force=True) >>>> >> >sage: p >>>> >> >{'perm_r': [1, 0], 'perm_c': [1, 0]} >>>> >> >sage: l >>>> >> >[1.0 0.0] >>>> >> >[0.0 1.0] >>>> >> >sage: u >>>> >> >[1.0 2.0] >>>> >> >[0.0 1.0] >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> >Shall I continue with this? >>>> >> >>>> >> sure, you are quite close to getting it all done it seems. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >On Tuesday, February 6, 2024 at 11:29:07 PM UTC+5:30 Dima Pasechnik >>>> wrote: >>>> >> > >>>> >> >> Non-square case for LU is in fact easy. Note that if you have >>>> A=LU as >>>> >> >> a block matrix >>>> >> >> A11 A12 >>>> >> >> A21 A22 >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> then its LU-factors L and U are >>>> >> >> L11 0 and U11 U12 >>>> >> >> L21 L22 0 U22 >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> and A11=L11 U11, A12=L11 U12, A21=L21 U11, A22=L21 U12+L22 U22 >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Assume that A11 is square and full rank (else one may apply >>>> >> >> permutations of rows and columns in the usual way). while A21=0 >>>> and >>>> >> >> A22=0. Then one can take L21=0, L22=U22=0, while A12=L11 U12 >>>> >> >> implies U12=L11^-1 A12. >>>> >> >> That is, we can first compute LU-decomposition of a square matrix >>>> A11, >>>> >> >> and then compute U12 from it and A. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Similarly, if instead A12=0 and A22=0, then we can take U12=0, >>>> >> >> L22=U22=0, and A21=L21 U11, >>>> >> >> i.e. L21=A21 U11^-1, and again we compute LU-decomposition of >>>> A11, and >>>> >> >> then L21=A21 U11^-1. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> ---------------- >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Note that in some cases one cannot get LU, but instead must go >>>> for an >>>> >> >> PLU,with P a permutation matrix. >>>> >> >> For non-square matrices this seems a bit more complicated, but, >>>> well, >>>> >> >> still doable. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> HTH >>>> >> >> Dima >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 6:00 PM Nils Bruin <nbr...@sfu.ca> wrote: >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > On Monday 5 February 2024 at 02:31:04 UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > it is the matter of adding extra zero rows or columns to the >>>> matrix >>>> >> you >>>> >> >> want to decompose. This could be a quick fix. >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > (in reference to computing LU decompositions of non-square >>>> matrices) >>>> >> -- >>>> >> >> in a numerical setting, adding extra zero rows/columns may not be >>>> such >>>> >> an >>>> >> >> attractive option: if previously you know you had a maximal rank >>>> >> matrix, >>>> >> >> you have now ruined it by the padding. It's worth checking the >>>> >> >> documentation and literature if padding is appropriate/desirable >>>> for >>>> >> the >>>> >> >> target algorithm/implementation. >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > -- >>>> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>> Google >>>> >> >> Groups "sage-devel" group. >>>> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>> it, >>>> >> send >>>> >> >> an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com. >>>> >> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/622a01e0-9197-40c5-beda-92729c4e4a32n%40googlegroups.com >>>> >>>> >> >> . >>>> >> >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/7a28f65b-a68d-4758-862e-b07d2e859d8bn%40googlegroups.com.