I fully second the observation of Michael though it might have few to do with the github switch. Sage development nowadays does not seem to be anymore about math research and efficient computations but mostly about "dependencies", "infrastructure" and "maintenance". I am always depressed by reading the change logs. It might have been a reasonable thing if sage was a "stable core Computer Algebra System" on which further specialized math research libraries would depend on. But the latter is not the official nor advised way of doing things.
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 14:02, Michael Orlitzky <mich...@orlitzky.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 11:30 +0000, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > We should not try to compete, in effect, with Conda etc, yet we do. This is > > the primary reason for slowness. > > > > My personal stats for the year 2023-02-08 through 2024-02-08: > > Commits: 423 > Reviews: 38 > > Zero of those have anything to do with mathematics. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/665f0fd945ca6301e75489e1922fb03462cda021.camel%40orlitzky.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAGEwAAmCkF%2Bj1XUQEuAK2B%3DD6WDT8Ejk9qrVBZ6fVvxg8H19EQ%40mail.gmail.com.
