On 25/01/2024 7:06, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
Hi,More than 13 years ago we have https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/10077 and https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/10078 that have comments about the case. Some further history might stem from stropping... For those looking in the docs, one place is here.
On 25/01/2024 10:18, Kwankyu Lee wrote: In my humble opinion, except No strong opinion from me, except maybe for having consistency
within a given file. The INPUT and OUTPUT blocks are related, but
they are not directives. Do you think they should be?
Regards, TB -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/b3ac9046-7edd-4f57-8e08-e5a198e0295e%40gmail.com. |
- [sage-devel] Sphinx directives in upper ... Kwankyu Lee
- [sage-devel] Re: Sphinx directives ... Kwankyu Lee
- Re: [sage-devel] Sphinx directives ... TB
- Re: [sage-devel] Sphinx directi... 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel
- Re: [sage-devel] Sphinx dir... Kwankyu Lee
- Re: [sage-devel] Sphinx directi... Kwankyu Lee