I was hesitant to send that message because I didn't want to have to go through this again.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:58 AM Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Does ./configure say why the system copy is unsuitable? > There is no system copy. I imagine it might be an artifact of the design of Sage on Mac app > Marc is releasing: > Very likely. vendor everything. > Vendor is a noun, not a verb. Is Apple's software distribution system so dumb that this is the only way? > If you think that Apple's requirement that apps be notarized is dumb, then I encourage you to take it up with Apple. Maybe Don Quixote will join you in the effort. I am serving people who use macOS; more than 8.800 of them in the case of Sage 10.1. I am fairly confident in claiming that the vast majority of Sage 10.1 users are using it on macOS from the Sage_macOS app. Even homebrew users are using that app, since it is what gets installed when you run "brew install sage" <https://formulae.brew.sh/cask/sage>, which works fine by the way. When I started this project you were griping about how many sage-support problems were related to macOS installation. I don't think you can claim that to be a problem any more. - Marc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CALcZXREOLVXQemMvTbVZDgf%3DWT3zOi-tmokJV_3%3DX%3D0zDO-cXw%40mail.gmail.com.
