Yes, the target repo of these PRs will be the (new) sagemath/sage, but the source will be sagemath/sagetrac-mirror, right? So in order to update the pull request one needs to push the changes to sagemath/sagetrac-mirror (it is not possible to update a PR by pushing to /refs/pull/xyz, because this is readonly). Thus, if sagetrac-mirror is archived (and thus readonly), the only way to work on existing tickets/branches would be to checkout the existing branch (from either sagetrac-mirror or sage/refs/pull), make changes, push to a new fork, create a new PR, close the old PR (essentially the workflow https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally#modifying-an-inactive-pull-request-locally).
On Tuesday, 27 September 2022 at 13:59:45 UTC+2 [email protected] wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:29 AM Tobias Diez <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > One more question: The current plan is to use the sagetrac-mirror repo > as the base for creating PRs but also to archived it. However, if I'm not > mistaken, that makes all branches in sagetrac-mirror readonly and thus one > cannot continue working on existing PRs by pushing to the corresponding > branch in sagetrac-mirror. > > IMHO the plan is to create new PRs in sagemath/sage, not in > sagemath/sagetrac-mirror > There won't be "existing" PRs, only issues, pointing to branches on > sagetrac-mirror > > > > > On Tuesday, 27 September 2022 at 10:02:06 UTC+2 [email protected] wrote: > >> > >> Matthias Koeppe schrieb am Samstag, 24. September 2022 um 19:09:46 > UTC+2: > >>> > >>> On Saturday, September 24, 2022 at 9:27:46 AM UTC-7 mathzeta2 wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Is it possible to choose the issue numbers in GH when making a > migration? Then, setting a redirect of the form " > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/$TICKET_NUMBER -> > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/$TICKET_NUMBER"; will make the > lion's share of the links still relevant. > >>> > >>> > >>> Yes, to map it like this is the plan. > >>> > >>>> > >>>> This does not preserve fragments like "#comment:7", which is useful > in long ticket discussions. > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, I've opened > https://github.com/sagemath/trac-to-github/issues/7 for this. > >> > >> Don’t we need an issue for the first point, as well? The example #26 > corresponds to #34110 which is not easy to recover from the migrated > information. > >> > >> Furthermore, it isn’t still clear to me how dependencies between PRs > will be visible (like in the Trac dependencies field). In the above example > you have to recover this from the history of commit messages (which may not > be clear enough in general). Shouldn’t the migration put something into the > header fields milestone, assignees, …, as well (if possible)? How will > authors and reviewers be visible? > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "sage-devel" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected]. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/d815783e-fd5c-4aa3-ab27-7024b18b299dn%40googlegroups.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/6df40198-0d1a-45f4-ac1f-2bee6e07d313n%40googlegroups.com.
