Thank you for managing to create the docket images for 9.3 and 9.4. I am using them to test the package slabbe and it made few issues appear that were working fine with <=9.2 (for instance the --memlimit disappeared, so it made me realize to fix that).
Would you also be able to create an image for sagemath-9.2 ? That would be awesome! The most recent version in the 9.2 series available on docker is 9.2.beta3. The previous versions are fine: the version 9.1 is not there as well, but 9.1.rc5 is, which should be quite close if not equal to 9.1. The version 9.0 is there. Sincerely, Sébastien On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 6:37:10 AM UTC+1 julian...@fsfe.org wrote: > I rebuilt the sagemath & sagemath-dev docker images for the tags 9.3, 9.4, > and latest (alias for 9.4). I am now pushing them to the Docker Hub so they > should be available shortly. > > The build scripts seem to work still, however, the images cannot be built > on tiger lake due to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32997 and each > build takes about 8h on my machine due to > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32998. > > On Sunday, December 5, 2021 at 9:15:40 AM UTC-6 m.derick...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> Yeah I had to use buildx to debug why the build was failing (standard >> docker build would not give enough logs). For me doing: >> >> docker buildx create --use --name larger_log --driver-opt >> env.BUILDKIT_STEP_LOG_MAX_SIZE=50000000 docker buildx build <same commands >> I was giving to the standard docker build command> >> Just worked without any other config. I guess you could even leave out >> the "--driver-opt env.BUILDKIT_STEP_LOG_MAX_SIZE=50000000" part. >> >> Note that for me the build was failing cause of the OOM killer killed one >> of the build processes, so the only thing I needed to do to make the build >> work is assign more resources to the docker container to make it work. >> >> On Sunday, 5 December 2021 at 15:14:32 UTC+1 dim...@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> Anyone tried using buildx? >>> >>> It seems to simplify setting up the build - although on Linux it >>> appears to have extra hoops to jump through. >>> >>> On Sun, 5 Dec 2021, 14:06 Maarten Derickx, <m.derick...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Julian, >>>> >>>> I didn't build a sagemath-dev image. So the first test will likely >>>> fail. I did manually test that the command line starts and that I could do >>>> computations which depend on singular pari and gap, and I also tested >>>> manually that jupyter starts and that I could do computations in it. The >>>> main purpose for building this image is that I use the sagemath docker >>>> images as base image for CI testing in a downstream package. And I needed >>>> certain features/fixes that are in 9.4 but not 9.2. And up to now all the >>>> CI tests of the downstream package pass just fine with this image. >>>> >>>> I will try to see if I can also successfully build and test a dev image. >>>> On Saturday, 4 December 2021 at 18:08:19 UTC+1 dim...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> One way or another, it's probably a good idea to run the builder on GH >>>>> Actions - translating one yml to another should be doable. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 4 Dec 2021, 16:11 julian...@fsfe.org, <julian...@fsfe.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Maarten, >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks for verifying that the Dockerfile still works. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 10:06:30 PM UTC-6 >>>>>> maarten...@navara.nl wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In the meantime I managed to verify that aside from the gitlab CI/CD >>>>>>> there are no other things that are broken. Meaning that I managed to >>>>>>> build >>>>>>> the docker file shipped with sage just fine on my laptop. I pushed a >>>>>>> build >>>>>>> of 9.4 to https://hub.docker.com/r/mderickx/sagemath/ in case >>>>>>> anyone is interested. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Did you also run the tests on the docker image? There are three tests >>>>>> defined here >>>>>> https://gitlab.com/sagemath/sage/-/blob/develop/.gitlab-ci.yml#L145. >>>>>> These often failed in the past with new releases. >>>>>> >>>>>> julian >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "sage-devel" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/6d614b77-f673-4dbf-9e38-661fc7af4247n%40googlegroups.com >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/6d614b77-f673-4dbf-9e38-661fc7af4247n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "sage-devel" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com. >>>> >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/fc867437-4b30-4efa-8d17-4f1c842bc984n%40googlegroups.com >>>> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/fc867437-4b30-4efa-8d17-4f1c842bc984n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/6f1b36fa-82cb-4acc-b763-481a288ce307n%40googlegroups.com.
