Built ok (kubuntu 7.70, gcc version 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease)
(Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2))
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py
Total time for all tests: 2712.3 seconds
Please see /home/jec/sage-2.10.2.rc0/tmp/test.log for the complete log
from this test.
Here are the details:
sage -t
devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py**********************************************************************
File "number_field.py", line 2619:
sage: [Plist[i]==K.ideal(pilist[i]) for i in range(len(Plist))]
Expected:
[True, False, True]
Got:
[True, False, False]
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 13 in __main__.example_78
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
For whitespace errors, see the file .doctest_number_field.py
[21.8 s]
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_base.pyx
[2.9 s]
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx
[6.9 s]
sage -t
devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element_quadratic.pyx
[2.8 s]
sage -t
devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py**********************************************************************
File "number_field_ideal.py", line 868:
sage: I.prime_factors()
Expected:
[Fractional ideal (-w)]
Got:
[Fractional ideal (w)]
**********************************************************************
The second one is an equivalent valid output, which can be fixed by
changing the expected output.
The first one is a doctest I wrote; I think it best to just delete
the last line from the doctest (lines 2619, 2620) since (1) the
factors produced by prime_factors() are not in a deterministic order
(I think), and (2) the exact result in the failing line depends on
what is returned by a pari function, which may also not be
deterministic. But the rest of this block of tests is 100% ok.
John
On 22/02/2008, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 22, 4:21 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 22, 2008, at 8:29 AM, Michael.Abshoff wrote:
> >
> > > Could you please post slightly more of the log? It looks like it
> > > happens
> > > during "make install" which would make it easy to fix. Is it
> > > reproducible?
> >
> > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/dmharvey/install.log.gz
> >
> > I am going to try building again now with -j1.
> >
> > david
>
>
> Hi David,
>
> I poked around in the install log and the issue is "Resource
> temporarily unavailable", i.e. the dreaded OSX resource limits that
> are too low. A suggested fix is at
>
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/Tips
>
> So: no bug in Sage here, nothing to see, go along ;)
>
> It would be nice if the two issues from Tips would be moved to the
> FAQ.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
>
> >
>
--
John Cremona
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
